This project has moved. For the latest updates, please go here.
20

Closed

LINQ Expression tree support - lambda should be convertible to Expression<...>

description

This is a follow-up to http://lists.ironpython.com/pipermail/users-ironpython.com/2009-December/011856.html; more discussion can be found there.
 
To support LINQ's IQueryable interface, a lambda expression should, like a C# lambda expression, be convertible to Expression<...>. Realistically, it should produce exactly the same expression tree that an equivalent C# lambda would produce, because that's what LINQ providers are going to be expecting.
Closed Dec 9, 2014 at 8:55 PM by jdhardy
Migrated to GitHub.

comments

HankFay wrote Mar 13, 2010 at 4:32 AM

IP really has 2 faces: the cpython face, and the .net face. If making the cpython lambda work with C# is unworkable, create a .Net lambda version in IP.

wrote Apr 6, 2010 at 4:45 PM

wrote May 31, 2010 at 7:59 PM

wrote Jun 14, 2010 at 9:28 PM

wrote Jun 15, 2010 at 2:18 PM

wrote Jun 24, 2010 at 9:28 PM

wrote Jun 27, 2010 at 10:31 PM

wrote Feb 17, 2011 at 5:52 AM

wrote Mar 18, 2011 at 3:16 PM

wrote Jun 12, 2011 at 12:04 PM

wrote Jun 16, 2011 at 4:41 AM

wrote Oct 24, 2011 at 11:28 PM

wrote Sep 18, 2012 at 1:31 AM

wrote Feb 22, 2013 at 2:10 AM

wrote May 13, 2013 at 5:07 PM

wrote Jun 9, 2013 at 8:24 PM

wrote Jun 19, 2013 at 8:53 PM

wrote Jan 7, 2014 at 3:07 PM

wrote Feb 11, 2014 at 11:59 AM

wrote Jul 16, 2014 at 8:21 AM

wrote Sep 5, 2014 at 6:35 PM

wrote Dec 9, 2014 at 8:55 PM